Reform of the reimbursement of criminal defense costs – Helpful tips from a lawyer

Anyone who appoints a defense lawyer in criminal proceedings is generally required to bear the costs of this representation. As of 1st August 2024, the legislator has now implemented a change to the so-called "Verteidigerkostenersatz", which is a reimbursement of the defense costs. This article deals with the recent changes to this reimbursement of costs in criminal law, the existing regulations and provides valuable information on the changes to the reimbursement of defense costs.

General information & changes to the reimbursement of criminal defense costs

Previously, the possibility of requesting reimbursement of costs was limited to the main trial before the court. Thus, an accused could not apply for a contribution to the costs of his defense lawyer even if the investigation proceedings were discontinued.

Sec 196a of the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO) now allows the accused to submit an application for a contribution to the costs of the defense as soon as the investigation proceedings are discontinued. In addition, the lump sums for the main hearing have been significantly increased in accordance with Sec 393a StPO. Previously, only a maximum amount of EUR 10,000 was possible, which has now been tripled to EUR 30,000.

An application for a contribution from the federal government must be submitted within three years of notification of the decision.

Amount of contributions

The contribution that can be granted in the main trial proceedings in accordance with Sec 393a StPO and in the event that the preliminary proceedings are discontinued in accordance with Sec 196a StPO is based on the necessary cash expenses borne by the accused. In addition, a lump sum for the costs of the defense counsel can also be requested, except in the case of Sec 61 para 2 StPO. This is to be determined taking into account the scope of the proceedings, the complexity of the factual and legal issues to be resolved and the extent of the necessary or expedient use.

According to Sec 393a StPO, the contribution in the event of an acquittal in the main trial proceedings may not exceed the following contributions:

  • EUR 30,000 in proceedings before the Regional Court acting as Court of Jurors and of Lay Assessors
  • In the proceedings before the single judge proceedings before the Regional Court EUR 13,000
  • In proceedings before the District Court EUR 5,000

In contrast, the reimbursement of costs is significantly lower if the investigation proceedings are discontinued. Sec 196a StPO provides for a maximum amount of EUR 6,000.

The respective maximum amounts may be exceeded by half if the proceedings are characterized by exceptional scope or particular complexity or if the maximum duration of the investigation proceedings is exceeded. In the case of extremely extensive proceedings, the contribution may even be doubled.

Do you have any questions on this topic or do you need support? Feel free to contact us directly.

Dr. Elias Schönborn

Do you have any questions on this topic or do you need support? Feel free to contact us directly.

Dr. Elias Schönborn
Attorney at Law & Criminal Defense Lawyer

Retroactive application

The changes in the area of reimbursement of defense costs that came into force on 1st August 2024 must be applied if the decision terminating the proceedings on which the application for reimbursement of defense costs is based has become legally binding as of 1st January 2024. Applications for (increased) reimbursement of costs can therefore still be submitted retroactively.


Even if an application for a reimbursement of costs has already been submitted since 1st January 2024 under the previous legal situation, an application can still be submitted in accordance with the new legal situation.

Exclusion of the right to compensation

According to Sec 196a para 3 StPO and Sec 393a para 3 StPO, there is no entitlement to compensation if the suspicion on which the proceedings were based was deliberately brought about by the accused.
Furthermore, there is no entitlement to compensation if the proceedings were terminated only because the accused committed the offense in a state of mental incapacity or because the power of prosecution was withdrawn.
Nor is there any right to compensation if the criminal liability ceases to exist for reasons that arise after the criminal proceedings have begun.

Dr. Elias Schönborn
Dr. Elias Schönborn
Attorney at Law & Criminal Defense Lawyer

CONCLUSION

For accused, the new regulation and extension of the reimbursement of defense costs brings welcome changes, even if – particularly in white-collar criminal law – it is actually only a contribution to the costs and not an actual reimbursement of costs. The amendment is not only accompanied by an extended scope for filing applications and allows for reimbursement of costs even if the investigation proceedings are discontinued, but also generally increases the maximum possible contributions. If you need assistance with a new application or general legal advice, feel free to contact us.
Picture of Dr. Elias Schönborn

Dr. Elias Schönborn

CONSULTATION APPOINTMENT

Fast and competent legal advice

Do you need legal support?
We are here for you – book a consultation appointment directly or use the contact form to get in touch with us.

CONTACT FORM